We optimize for sum-squared error in the output of our model. We use sum-squared error because it is easy to optimize, however it does not perfectly align with our goal of maximizing average precision. It weights localization error equally with classification error which may not be ideal. Also, in every image many grid cells do not contain any object. This pushes the β€œconfidence” scores of those cells towards zero, often overpowering the gradient from cells that do contain objects. This can lead to model instability, causing training to diverge early on.

To remedy this, we increase the loss from bounding box coordinate predictions and decrease the loss from confidence predictions for boxes that don’t contain objects. We use two parameters, Ξ»coord\lambda_{coord} and Ξ»noobj\lambda_{noobj} to accomplish this. We set Ξ»coord=5\lambda_{coord} = 5 and Ξ»noobj=0.5\lambda_{noobj} = 0.5.

Sum-squared error also equally weights errors in large boxes and small boxes. Our error metric should reflect that small deviations in large boxes matter less than in small boxes. To partially address this we predict the square root of the bounding box width and height instead of the width and height directly.

YOLO predicts multiple bounding boxes per grid cell. At training time we only want one bounding box predictor to be responsible for each object. We assign one predictor to be β€œresponsible” for predicting an object based on which prediction has the highest current IOU with the ground truth. This leads to specialization between the bounding box predictors. Each predictor gets better at predicting certain sizes, aspect ratios, or classes of object, improving overall recall.

where 1iobj1^{obj}_i denotes if object appears in cell i and 1ijobj1^{obj}_{ij} denotes that the j-th bounding box predictor in cell i is β€œresponsible” for that prediction.

B=(txtytwthto)B = \begin{pmatrix} t_x & t_y & t_w & t_h & t_o \end{pmatrix}
x=logistic(tx),y=logistic(ty),w=logistic(tw),h=logistic(th),C=logistic(to),p(ck)=softmax(ck)\begin{aligned} x &= logistic(t_x), & y&= logistic(t_y), & w &= logistic(t_w), & h &= logistic(t_h), \\ C &= logistic(t_o), & p(c_k) &= softmax(c_k) \end{aligned}
Loss=Ξ»coordβˆ‘i=0S2βˆ‘j=0B1ijobj[(xijβˆ’x^ij)2+(yijβˆ’y^ij)2+(wijβˆ’w^ij)2+(hijβˆ’h^ij)2]+βˆ‘i=0S2βˆ‘j=0B1ijobj(IOUpredtruthβˆ’C^ij)2+Ξ»noobjβˆ‘i=0S2βˆ‘j=0B1ijnoobj(0βˆ’C^ij)2+βˆ‘i=0S21iobjβˆ‘c∈classes(pi(c)βˆ’p^i(c))2\begin{aligned} Loss &= \lambda_{coord} \sum^{S^2}_{i=0} \sum^B_{j=0} 1^{obj}_{ij} \left[ \left( x_{ij} - \hat{x}_{ij} \right)^2 + \left( y_{ij} - \hat{y}_{ij} \right)^2 + \left( \sqrt{w_{ij}}- \sqrt{\hat{w}_{ij}} \right)^2 + \left( \sqrt{h_{ij}} - \sqrt{\hat{h}_{ij}} \right)^2 \right] \\ &+ \sum^{S^2}_{i=0} \sum^B_{j=0} 1^{obj}_{ij} \left( IOU^{truth}_{pred} - \hat{C}_{ij} \right)^2 \\ &+ \lambda_{noobj} \sum^{S^2}_{i=0} \sum^B_{j=0} 1^{noobj}_{ij} \left( 0 - \hat{C}_{ij} \right)^2 \\ &+ \sum^{S^2}_{i=0} 1^{obj}_i \sum_{c \in classes} \left( p_i(c) - \hat{p}_i(c) \right)^2 \end{aligned}


When we move to anchor boxes we also decouple the class prediction mechanism from the spatial location and instead predict class and objectness for every anchor box. Following YOLO, the objectness prediction still predicts the IOU of the ground truth and the proposed box and the class predictions predict he conditional probability of that class given that there is an object.

B=(txtytwthtoc0c1...)B= \begin{pmatrix} t_x & t_y & t_w & t_h & t_o & c_0 & c_1 & ... & \end{pmatrix} \\
x=logistic(tx)+cxi,y=logistic(ty)+cyi,w=pwetw,h=phethC=logistic(to),p(ck)=softmax(ck),pβˆ—=anchorβˆ—\begin{aligned} x &= logistic(t_x) + c_{xi}, & y &= logistic(t_y) + c_{yi}, & w &= p_w e^{t_w}, & h &= p_h e^{t_h} \\ C &= logistic(t_o), & p(c_k) &= softmax(c_k), & p_* &= anchor_* \end{aligned}
1obj=max(IOUanchortruth)1^{obj} = max(IOU^{truth}_{anchor})
Loss=Ξ»coordβˆ‘i=0S2βˆ‘j=0B1ijobj(2βˆ’wijhij)[(xijβˆ’x^ij)2+(yijβˆ’y^ij)2+(wijβˆ’w^ij)2+(hijβˆ’h^ij)2]+Ξ»objβˆ‘i=0S2βˆ‘j=0B1ijobj(IOUpredtruthβˆ’C^ij)2+Ξ»noobjβˆ‘i=0S2βˆ‘j=0B1ijnoobj(0βˆ’C^ij)2+Ξ»classβˆ‘i=0S2βˆ‘j=0B1ijobjβˆ‘c∈classes(pi(c)βˆ’p^i(c))2\begin{aligned} Loss &= \lambda_{coord} \sum^{S^2}_{i=0} \sum^B_{j=0} 1^{obj}_{ij} \left( 2 - w_{ij}h_{ij} \right) \left[ \left( x_{ij} - \hat{x}_{ij} \right)^2 + \left( y_{ij} - \hat{y}_{ij} \right)^2 + \left( w_{ij}- \hat{w}_{ij} \right)^2 + \left( h_{ij} - \hat{h}_{ij} \right)^2 \right] \\ &+ \lambda_{obj} \sum^{S^2}_{i=0} \sum^B_{j=0} 1^{obj}_{ij} \left( IOU^{truth}_{pred} - \hat{C}_{ij} \right)^2 \\ &+ \lambda_{noobj} \sum^{S^2}_{i=0} \sum^B_{j=0} 1^{noobj}_{ij} \left( 0 - \hat{C}_{ij} \right)^2 \\ &+ \lambda_{class} \sum^{S^2}_{i=0} \sum^B_{j=0} 1^{obj}_{ij} \sum_{c \in classes} \left( p_i(c) - \hat{p}_i(c) \right)^2 \end{aligned}


During training we use sum of squared error loss. If the ground truth for some coordinate prediction is tβˆ—t_* our gradient is the ground truth value (computed from the ground truth box) minus our prediction: tβˆ—βˆ’t^βˆ—t_* βˆ’ \hat{t}_*. This ground truth value can be easily computed by inverting the equations above.

YOLOv3 predicts an objectness score for each bounding box using logistic regression. This should be 1 if the bounding box prior overlaps a ground truth object by more than any other bounding box prior. If the bounding box prior is not the best but does overlap a ground truth object by more than some threshold we ignore the prediction, following Faster R-CNN. We use the threshold of 0.5. Unlike Faster R-CNN, our system only assigns one bounding box prior for each ground truth object. If a bounding box prior is not assigned to a ground truth object it incurs no loss for coordinate or class predictions, only objectness.

Each box predicts the classes the bounding box may contain using multilabel classification. We do not use a softmax as we have found it is unnecessary for good performance, instead we simply use independent logistic classifiers. During training we use binary cross-entropy loss for the class predictions.

B=(txtytwthtoc0c1...)B= \begin{pmatrix} t_x & t_y & t_w & t_h & t_o & c_0 & c_1 & ... & \end{pmatrix} \\
x=logistic(tx)+cxi,y=logistic(ty)+cyi,w=pwetw,h=phethC=logistic(to),p(ck)=logistic(ck),pβˆ—=anchorβˆ—\begin{aligned} x &= logistic(t_x) + c_{xi}, & y &= logistic(t_y) + c_{yi}, & w &= p_w e^{t_w}, & h &= p_h e^{t_h} \\ C &= logistic(t_o), & p(c_k) &= logistic(c_k), & p_* &= anchor_* \end{aligned}
1obj=max(IOUanchortruth)1^{obj} = max(IOU^{truth}_{anchor})
Loss=Ξ»coordβˆ‘i=0S2βˆ‘j=0B1ijobj1ijIOUanchortruth>0.5(2βˆ’wijhij)[(txijβˆ’tx^ij)2+(tyijβˆ’ty^ij)2+(twijβˆ’tw^ij)2+(thijβˆ’th^ij)2]+Ξ»objβˆ‘i=0S2βˆ‘j=0B[βˆ’Cijlog⁑C^ijβˆ’(1βˆ’Cij)log⁑(1βˆ’C^ij)]+Ξ»classβˆ‘i=0S2βˆ‘j=0B1ijobjβˆ‘c∈classes[βˆ’pi(c)log⁑p^i(c)βˆ’(1βˆ’pi(c))log⁑(1βˆ’p^i(c))]\begin{aligned} Loss &= \lambda_{coord} \sum^{S^2}_{i=0} \sum^B_{j=0} 1^{obj}_{ij} 1^{IOU^{truth}_{anchor} > 0.5}_{ij} \left( 2 - w_{ij}h_{ij} \right) \\ & \qquad \qquad \left[ \left( t_{xij} - \hat{t_x}_{ij} \right)^2 + \left( t_{yij} - \hat{t_y}_{ij} \right)^2 + \left( t_{wij}- \hat{t_w}_{ij} \right)^2 + \left( t_{hij} - \hat{t_h}_{ij} \right)^2 \right] \\ &+ \lambda_{obj} \sum^{S^2}_{i=0} \sum^B_{j=0} \left[ - C_{ij} \log \hat{C}_{ij} - \left( 1 - C_{ij} \right) \log \left( 1 - \hat{C}_{ij} \right) \right] \\ &+ \lambda_{class} \sum^{S^2}_{i=0} \sum^B_{j=0} 1^{obj}_{ij} \sum_{c \in classes} \left[ - p_i(c) \log \hat{p}_i(c) - \left( 1- p_i(c) \right) \log \left( 1 - \hat{p}_i(c) \right) \right] \end{aligned}


Bag of Freebies (BoF) for backbone: CutMix and Mosaic data augmentation, DropBlock regularization, Class label smoothing

Bag of Specials (BoS) for backbone: Mish activation, Cross-stage partial connections (CSP), Multi-input weighted residual connections (MiWRC)

Bag of Freebies (BoF) for detector: CIoU-loss, CmBN, DropBlock regularization, Mosaic data augmentation, Self-Adversarial Training, Eliminate grid sensitivity, Using multiple anchors for a single ground truth, Cosine annealing scheduler(SGDR), Optimal hyper-parameters, Random training shapes

Bag of Specials (BoS) for detector: Mish activation, SPP-block, SAM-block, PAN path-aggregation block, DIoU-NMS

B=(txtytwthtoc0c1...)B= \begin{pmatrix} t_x & t_y & t_w & t_h & t_o & c_0 & c_1 & ... & \end{pmatrix} \\
x=scale(logistic(tx))+cxi,y=scale(logistic(ty))+cyi,w=pwetw,h=phethC=logistic(to),p(ck)=logistic(ck),pβˆ—=anchorβˆ—\begin{aligned} x &= scale(logistic(t_x)) + c_{xi}, & y &= scale(logistic(t_y)) + c_{yi}, & w &= p_w e^{t_w}, & h &= p_h e^{t_h} \\ C &= logistic(t_o), & p(c_k) &= logistic(c_k), & p_* &= anchor_* \end{aligned}
1obj=max(IOUanchorstruth)andIOUanchorstruth>iou_thresh1^{obj} = max(IOU^{truth}_{anchors}) \quad and \quad IOU^{truth}_{anchors} > iou\_thresh
Loss=Ξ»coordβˆ‘i=0S2βˆ‘j=0B1ijobj(1βˆ’CIOU(pred,truth))+Ξ»objβˆ‘i=0S2βˆ‘j=0B[βˆ’Cijlog⁑C^ijβˆ’(1βˆ’Cij)log⁑(1βˆ’C^ij)]+Ξ»classβˆ‘i=0S2βˆ‘j=0B1ijobjβˆ‘c∈classes[βˆ’pi(c)log⁑p^i(c)βˆ’(1βˆ’pi(c))log⁑(1βˆ’p^i(c))]\begin{aligned} Loss &= \lambda_{coord} \sum^{S^2}_{i=0} \sum^B_{j=0} 1^{obj}_{ij} \left( 1 - CIOU(pred, truth) \right) \\ &+ \lambda_{obj} \sum^{S^2}_{i=0} \sum^B_{j=0} \left[ - C_{ij} \log \hat{C}_{ij} - \left( 1 - C_{ij} \right) \log \left( 1 - \hat{C}_{ij} \right) \right] \\ &+ \lambda_{class} \sum^{S^2}_{i=0} \sum^B_{j=0} 1^{obj}_{ij} \sum_{c \in classes} \left[ - p_i(c) \log \hat{p}_i(c) - \left( 1- p_i(c) \right) \log \left( 1 - \hat{p}_i(c) \right) \right] \end{aligned}


Last updated on